Sunday, April 13, 2014

The affects of crew rest requirements

For this blog discussion, I will choose a topic that has major impact on Part 121 operations and my career in aviation management, crew flight time limitations.  If you go to the previous link, you will find the 314 page final rule on crew rest requirements for Part 121 operations, that's right 314 pages.  When the FAA does a study, publishes a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM), and adopts a final rule, they kill a few trees.  This final rule applies only to passenger carrying operations in an attempt to reduce accidents caused by fatigue where a risk for greater loss of life exists.  It does not apply to cargo operations which has the Airline Pilots Association very upset, as if cargo pilots are not allowed to use fatigue as cause for not being fit to fly.  As if the cargo crews lives are not as valuable as the passengers in other operations.  The FAA is attempting to make aviation safer for all but often doesn't take into account all of the side effects or missed opportunities for safety as with the cargo operations.  As with many previous regulations this one is said to be written in blood.  A handful of accidents where fatigue as cited as a contributing factor or probable cause has urged the FAA to make changes to policies relating to crew rest and on duty limitations.

The issue now lies in the hands of the Part 121 passenger carrying operators to make sure their flight crews are fit for duty and not fatigued.  Operators must ensure crews meet specific off duty time rest requirements between operations.  The cargo crews are still fighting for the FAA to make it a rule that includes them but has not happened yet.  This rule has created a need to utilize more crews in 121 operations to conduct the same number of flights.  The economic impact is increased pilot wages and decreased gross profits for 121 operators.  Where ten crews may have flown 60 legs in a week prior to the rule change, it may now require twelve crews to fly the same 60 legs.  The rule is in affect and Part 121 operators have to deal with the extra crew resource requirements and the financial impact it will have on them.  They will either choose to higher more pilots and bare the cost or reduce the number of operations dropping the least profitable routes.

The issue of crew rest requirements will impact my future career in management because I will have to find more ways to be profitable on flights.  With the increased need for flight crews to conduct the same number of operations, margins will be down.  The way airlines are operating slim right now, this could be a major impact to some, enough so that it will make them cease operations.  I will have a tough time trying to tell pilots I need to pay them less because I need more of them for the same number of flights.  I will have to convince them that because they are flying less hours, they are less productive to me and thus will require a lower wage.  This will not be an easy task, but it is that or tell them to look else where for employment because I will be cutting routes and have no need for excess crews.  Either way the Part 121 operator will have less revenue in which to operate and may need to seek government bailouts to continue to exist.....

1 comment:

  1. What are other ways besides government bailouts to compensate for the costs associated with this new regulation? Maybe upper level management can take some pay cuts similar to what the pilots have been experiencing over the last decade? Or maybe the cost will have to be passed down to the passenger? I do agree - someone will end up paying for this, but I don't necessarily think it only has to be the pilots.

    ReplyDelete